Spinomed active back brace

Active extension of the spine
Strengthens the abdominal and back muscles
Study proved effectiveness (1,2)

Skip to the beginning of the images gallery

Description

The Spinomed® active corselette variant is a back brace that leads to active straightening of the upper body by the biofeedback system. It strengthens the abdominal and back musclesand thus relieves the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spinomed® active complies with the recommendations in the current note for guidance of the Dachverband Osteologie e.V. (DVO). According to these, the effect of a back brace should be to hold the spine erect.(3) The more erect posture increases lung volume, while, at the same time, reducing the typical tendency in osteoporosis for the body to sway. This can prevent fractures in the elderly.

Spinomed® active can be used for all indications, in which relief and/or correction of the thoracic and lumbar spine is necessary. These include:

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine
Juvenile osteochondrosis
Rounded back with chronic back pain

Spinomed® active is worn inconspicuously under clothing. With the help of the aluminium back rib, the corselette can be individually moulded to the contour of the spine without any tools. Adjustable shoulder straps ensure a perfect fit. Spinomed® active is also available in a number of variants - for different needs

With cup
Without cup
Black
Champagne

The clinical study proves the efficacy of Spinomed® active.(4)

Intended purpose:

Spinomed active is a brace designed to actively relieve load and correct the lumbar spine/thoracic spine in the sagittal plane.

Sources:

(1) Pfeifer M et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83(3):177–186.

(2) Pfeifer M et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90(10):805–815.

(3) DVO. Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie der Osteoporose bei postmenopausalen Frauen und bei Männern. 2017:196–200. URL: http://dv-osteologie.org/uploads/Leitlinie%202017/Finale%20Version%20Leitlinie%20Osteoporose%202017_end.pdf (30.09.2020).

(4) Pfeifer M et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90(10):805–815.